|
| |
|
Characterizing the Significance of Baptism
It is a tremendous benefit for many that we today live in societies which allow
a variety of religious views to exist alongside one another. That has not
always been the case. Unfortunately, in the pages of history there are
some Christians who even gave their lives for their views on baptism. What
significance should a Christian attach to baptism? What is the correct
balance which gives proper value to the matter but at the same time does not
allow this aspect of the faith to exert undue influence in such a way that one's
walk with Christ is adversely affected?
The following is adapted from material which appeared in the
Christian Reformed
Agenda to Synod 2000 (pages 27 and 28):
Some view a person’s stand on the issue of baptism as a
reflection of fundamental and confessional principles of Scripture. Others
suggest that the issue may be viewed as
adiaphora, like eating meat versus
eating only vegetables (see
Rom. 14). Is baptism CONFESSIONAL in the sense that
the main articles of the Apostles' Creed are confessional? Does it merit
classification along with essential doctrines of salvation or the nature of God?
Does it undermine the teachings about Jesus, his birth, ministry, death,
resurrection, and present reign? Does it detract from the Bible's teaching about
the Holy Spirit and the way of salvation? In a case of serious doctrinal error
we know what needs to be done. If this baptism issue were an essential
confessional issue, our salvation would depend on it. That is not the case. Is
baptism A MORAL ISSUE, like committing adultery, killing, stealing, or any other
violation of God's covenant code? If it were such a moral issue, it would
test whether our faith is real or fake. Does the issue then belong to the ADIAPHORA, the disputable matters? We judge that such a designation is not
really satisfactory either. Then what kind of issue is it?
|

Statue of King George III
Great Windsor Forest |
Perhaps a more helpful approach can be made from the WISDOM literature of the
Bible. The Bible's wisdom literature is intended to help God's people to model
their conduct, individually and communally, after the principles that reflect
God's will for living beneficial and productive lives. . . . the church was
given wisdom principles to guide her in the regulation of worship
and in the appointment of office bearers (I
Tim. 2:3;
I Cor. 11:2-16). Wisdom principles help people pull together
insights and truths from
a number of spheres: the nature of the created order,
observable societal principles and circumstances, and, in
particular, the nature of humankind as illuminated by God's special
revelation. Wisdom teachings provide boundaries and goals for human
life in the presence of God. Couldn’t the issue of baptism be
approached from a similar perspective? How can the church act wisely
today? Characterizing the issue as a wisdom issue seems more
accurate than categorizing it as a doctrinal, moral, or |
|
disputable matter, as summarized above.
Characterizing an issue as a wisdom matter in no way lessens the
authority of any passage of Scripture from which the teaching is
drawn. But attempting to characterize an issue properly is of
genuine help in discerning the area and the extent of our
differences on the issue. It also helps us to know how to respond
appropriately when we reach differing conclusions.
Click here to email this page to a friend.
Intro to Infant
Baptism
Infant Baptism Main Page
Dialogos Studies Home Page |
|